All times are UTC


It is currently Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:22 am



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:34 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:44 pm
Posts: 484
Location: London
Maybe it's the case of your opponent being better than you, rather than his army being overpowered? I just don't understand why do people assume that an army is overpowered just because they can't beat the player who uses their army? It's a very similar thing that often happens to me with dice - I can't count how many times people have blamed bad rolls because they lost the game, while most of them don't realise or don't want to realise that they're just being outplayed. Last time I moaned about dice was for 30 minutes after my loss to the eventual 2010 GT winner (I was 2nd in that one). But then I realised that I moaned only because I was too arrogant to say that I had been outplayed by a better player. After that I never again moaned about dice or about the army any of my opponents ever used.

One has to learn how to lose, only then one can become a winner.

_________________
Coordinator of the Great British Hobbit League
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:39 pm 
Elven Warrior
Elven Warrior
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:48 am
Posts: 787
Location: The Netherlands
Images: 3
BlackMist wrote:
Maybe it's the case of your opponent being better than you, rather than his army being overpowered? I just don't understand why do people assume that an army is overpowered just because they can't beat the player who uses their army? It's a very similar thing that often happens to me with dice - I can't count how many times people have blamed bad rolls because they lost the game, while most of them don't realise or don't want to realise that they're just being outplayed. Last time I moaned about dice was for 30 minutes after my loss to the eventual 2010 GT winner (I was 2nd in that one). But then I realised that I moaned only because I was too arrogant to say that I had been outplayed by a better player. After that I never again moaned about dice or about the army any of my opponents ever used.

One has to learn how to lose, only then one can become a winner.

I completely agree, looks like we have another veteran here online.

_________________
Ours is the fury!
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 6:45 pm 
Kinsman
Kinsman
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:05 pm
Posts: 143
I've used a few 'pure dwarf' lists in the new rules and I've yet to lose with them. But then I've not been up against GT style armies.

Woodelves are still as competitive as ever. Multiple call winds ruins wraiths on fellbeast and can neutralise threats reasonably quickly.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:00 pm 
Elven Warrior
Elven Warrior
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:48 am
Posts: 787
Location: The Netherlands
Images: 3
The newbie wrote:
I've used a few 'pure dwarf' lists in the new rules and I've yet to lose with them. But then I've not been up against GT style armies.

Woodelves are still as competitive as ever. Multiple call winds ruins wraiths on fellbeast and can neutralise threats reasonably quickly.

Haha, it's so good to see all that mighty nazgul trying to get to your archers,but then being pulled back by the wind.

_________________
Ours is the fury!
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:40 am 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:40 pm
Posts: 474
Images: 7
@mastermanje- Yes, indeed, BlackMist is quite the vet in ME. And it is always interesting fighting armies that are geared for being the best in a given situation.

Harad, in this case, is a capable force, but is not, I think, overpowered.

_________________
"...in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:39 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:21 pm
Posts: 370
Location: Sunny, sexy Spain!
BlackMist wrote:
Maybe it's the case of your opponent being better than you, rather than his army being overpowered? I just don't understand why do people assume that an army is overpowered just because they can't beat the player who uses their army? It's a very similar thing that often happens to me with dice - I can't count how many times people have blamed bad rolls because they lost the game, while most of them don't realise or don't want to realise that they're just being outplayed. Last time I moaned about dice was for 30 minutes after my loss to the eventual 2010 GT winner (I was 2nd in that one). But then I realised that I moaned only because I was too arrogant to say that I had been outplayed by a better player. After that I never again moaned about dice or about the army any of my opponents ever used.

One has to learn how to lose, only then one can become a winner.

I've never played vs. Harad, but I PLAY Harad; and I just havent lost yet!! It seems, to me, to be simply the best army to play. Thats my opinion

_________________
I'm the good and the bad; you must be the ugly
I'd mess up your face but your momma did it for me!
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:16 pm 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:42 pm
Posts: 3131
Location: In Angband, at Morgoth's feet.
BlackMist wrote:
Maybe it's the case of your opponent being better than you, rather than his army being overpowered? I just don't understand why do people assume that an army is overpowered just because they can't beat the player who uses their army? It's a very similar thing that often happens to me with dice - I can't count how many times people have blamed bad rolls because they lost the game, while most of them don't realise or don't want to realise that they're just being outplayed. Last time I moaned about dice was for 30 minutes after my loss to the eventual 2010 GT winner (I was 2nd in that one). But then I realised that I moaned only because I was too arrogant to say that I had been outplayed by a better player. After that I never again moaned about dice or about the army any of my opponents ever used.

One has to learn how to lose, only then one can become a winner.

He isn't better than me, I've beaten him more than enough to prove that, with the only reason I lose is because they have such high defence+high fight+good courage+great heros+they cost less than an uruk-hai, who has worse stats. Obviously a pt of fight can be be better than a pt of str depending on who you fight, but you still can compare them as being equal in value, you just have to choose which stats would be better in which situation.

_________________
:saruman "Leave Sauron to me."
If you're in the Raleigh, NC area, let me know.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:55 am 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:40 pm
Posts: 474
Images: 7
Excellent analysis, Drauglin. Having used uruks against elves a myriad of times, I find that my fight value tends to be obsolete, except for the captain. but yes, it is a situational analysis.

_________________
"...in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:44 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:44 pm
Posts: 484
Location: London
Draugluin wrote:
with the only reason I lose is because they have such high defence+high fight+good courage+great heros+they cost less than an uruk-hai, who has worse stats.

So you do realise that Dwarf is better than an Uruk Hai in a vacuum. However you seem to fail to adjust your army accordingly. It is futile to use uruks against dwarves, while you can have warg riders (cavalry is the dwarves' biggest nemesis) and orcs with much higher numbers. You also fail to notice that uruk hai captains are amazing against dwarves: F5 with S5 with a spear and pike support means easily 2 dead D7 models per turn. Combine them with orcs and cavalry and you'll see that you'll have an edge. Basically as it stands it seems like you're trying to beat rock with scissors instead of paper (quite literally orcs can help to overwhelm the rock, while your S4 scissors are wasting their strength). If you were to post an army list then I'd be happy to comment further. Again, dwarves are not overpowered, you just have to learn how to beat them and what tools to use. Just like with any other army.

Edited for the purpose of fixing the quote marks

_________________
Coordinator of the Great British Hobbit League


Last edited by BlackMist on Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:55 pm 
Elven Warrior
Elven Warrior
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:48 am
Posts: 787
Location: The Netherlands
Images: 3
BlackMist wrote:
[Qoute="Draugluin"]with the only reason I lose is because they have such high defence+high fight+good courage+great heros+they cost less than an uruk-hai, who has worse stats.

So you do realise that Dwarf is better than an Uruk Hai in a vacuum. However you seem to fail to adjust your army accordingly. It is futile to use uruks against dwarves, while you can have warg riders (cavalry is the dwarves' biggest nemesis) and orcs with much higher numbers. You also fail to notice that uruk hai captains are amazing against dwarves: F5 with S5 with a spear and pike support means easily 2 dead D7 models per turn. Combine them with orcs and cavalry and you'll see that you'll have an edge. Basically as it stands it seems like you're trying to beat rock with scissors instead of paper (quite literally orcs can help to overwhelm the rock, while your S4 scissors are wasting their strength). If you were to post an army list then I'd be happy to comment further. Again, dwarves are not overpowered, you just have to learn how to beat them and what tools to use. Just like with any other army.[/quote]
omg, how many good posts of you will we see the coming time?! You're always right imo.

_________________
Ours is the fury!
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:41 pm 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:42 pm
Posts: 3131
Location: In Angband, at Morgoth's feet.
I don't have any orcs because I lack the fundage to buy any. If I could drop one of the uruks strength for more of them, I would. But I can't. I do have a lot of goblins, and they have won several games, however, the fact still remains that dwarves are underpriced.

_________________
:saruman "Leave Sauron to me."
If you're in the Raleigh, NC area, let me know.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:32 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:58 pm
Posts: 301
I have always thought the dwarves were underpriced becasue they didn't have a spear option. Similar to have harad used to be underpriced. Also as I have before, the expensive troops need to be underpriced since the cheaper troops benefit more from the fact that the basic 3 3 3 1 1 3 profile is underpriced. Uruks are exceptions, but their captains are 5 points underprice if I remember correctly. Besides, I don't really see the problem, you both need 6's too wound, you have equal fight, but you have access to support and can move longer so you can choose your fights. It's only fair that they are one point cheaper.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:40 am 
Loremaster
Loremaster
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:47 pm
Posts: 1040
Location: Newton Aycliffe, UK
Dwarves are also slower (5" movement). Perhaps movement is an oft-overlooked stat when comparing points values.

_________________
My (more regularly updated) painting blog:
https://www.facebook.com/Pindergorn/
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:45 am 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:42 pm
Posts: 3131
Location: In Angband, at Morgoth's feet.
The fact that I can move a mere inch more and support is more than compensated for the fact that he can have more dwarves. And he has more courage, meaning he'll stick around longer. And an inch of movement apperently costs half a point, seeing as Mauhur and Gildor's upgrades cost 1 point for 2 inches of movement.

_________________
:saruman "Leave Sauron to me."
If you're in the Raleigh, NC area, let me know.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 8:29 am 
Craftsman
Craftsman
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:58 pm
Posts: 301
No, going from 4 to 5 or 5 to 6 inches definitly costs 1 point seeing as these are the most important ones. "He can stick around longer" You do know that you have accsess to Ugluk, Saruman and Shamans right? I don't really get how numbers can be a problem for you

2x Uruk Hai Captain w/HA and shield 120 points
1x Shaman 60 points
32x Uruk Warriors w/ some weapon 320 points.

500 points 35 guys.

No Dwarf player can top that if they include their belowed heroes or dire needed elites and banners. And if they don't include those, they will definitly loose.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 8:41 am 
Craftsman
Craftsman
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:44 pm
Posts: 484
Location: London
And yet again I will say this: You cannot objectively compare 2 models in a vacuum. If you were then for the price of 10 Uruks you can get 11 Dwarves. Not a game breaking difference to start with. Now look at it practically: a warband of Ugluk and 12 Uruk Hai costs 180pts, which is the same as a warband of Gimli and 10 Dwarves - you already have a 2 model advantage. Of course Gimli is better, but Ugluk has a great special rule, 3 Might and cuts through Dwarves at the same speed as does Gimli. Now have a look at sample army lists in 500pts and you'll see that in reality Dwarves will have by far lower numbers than any decent 500pts Isengard lists:

Basic Army lists:
Gimli
Balin
Dwarf Captain
29 Dwarves with shield, bow or 2 handed weapon

Total 501 for 32 models. Of course you are free to play with 2 warbands and a model count of 26 (which is pretty terrible for such a slow force with no versatility whatsoever).

This can go against the most basic list of:
Ugluk
Vrashku
Lurtz
32 Uruk Hai with equipment

That is the simplest example, but while Dwarves can't really do any other combos, here's a bunch of things which Isengard can do:

Example 1:
Ugluk
Vrashku
Lurtz
12 Uruks with Shield
18 Orcs with Spears
6 Berserkers

498 with 39 models (advantage of at 6 models)

Example 2:
Ugluk
Lurtz
Sharku on a Warg
11 Warg Riders with shields
11 Uruks with Shields
12 Orcs with spears

500pts, 37 models with 12 cavalry that will annihilate the slow unsupported dwarves units.

====================

I hope you see what I mean now.

By saying that Dwarves are underpriced, you are saying that they are overpowered, as one is exactly the same as the other. Both terms refer to a model too powerful for its price. Are Dwarves overpowered then given the above lists? Not in a million years.

Of course you can also play a following list:
3 Captains
36 Dwarves with equipment

504 points with 39 models

But then you're not using any of your good heroes, you're down by 3 Might compared to the Isengard list, your list is boring as hell and your list isn't going to be any good against a bunch of other good or evil lists that you may be facing. Isengard is only one of your problems, there's always a Moria force with 5 warbands in 500pts, aka. 65 models. There's always a Reaver-based Harad force that will outfight you with 3A F5 against your 1A F4 front line. There's a bunch of High Elf lists which die on 6s, kill on 6s just like you, but have higher Fight value, hence win more combats. Then there's a bunch of Mordor combos, each of 39-52 models, including stuff like a Spider Queen. Then there's even a Rohan force with Eowyn, Eomer and about 24 Riders that will give you a horrible time due to their huge movement.

Yes, a Dwarf is overpowered in a vacuum comparison to an Uruk Hai. Great, what now? Nothing, since the game has a million other factors that you need to take into account.

Draugluin wrote:
I do have a lot of goblins, and they have won several games, however, the fact still remains that dwarves are underpriced.

So the Dwarves are underpriced, and yet you're beating them with Goblins, but not Uruks... something's wrong here. If they were underpriced then they would have an edge on everybody, not just 1 specific model.

_________________
Coordinator of the Great British Hobbit League
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:40 am 
Craftsman
Craftsman
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:58 pm
Posts: 301
Thank you once again BM for your insight. I really dislike the vacuum comparasant, where you don't factor in spear supprt, banners and friendly special rules.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:43 am 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:04 pm
Posts: 6308
Location: Wandering around looking for Middle-earth
Images: 58
BlackMist, a little off topic, but they are in the Harad list, what do you think of the newer Half Trolls?

_________________
"I am the Flying Spagetti Monster. Thou shall have no other monsters before me"
-FSM.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:06 am 
Craftsman
Craftsman
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:44 pm
Posts: 484
Location: London
I think it's a close call between Half Trolls and Reavers, it depends on the rest of your army. If you're using a wraith on FB then often Half Trolls won't give sufficient numbers, so I'd go with Reavers. If not, and you have just a bunch of captains leading the army then Half Trolls are definitely worth looking at.

Betrayer on FB
6 Reavers
6 Harad spearmen

Captain
6 Reavers
6 Harad spearmen

Is 1 point more than:
Captain
5 Half Trolls
5 Harad Spearmen

Captain
6 Half Trolls
5 Harad Spearmen

Is the Ringwraith worth the S5, D6, W2 upgrade? Close call. In 1000pts I wouldn't mind both.

_________________
Coordinator of the Great British Hobbit League
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Overpowered Harad
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 4:14 pm 
Wayfarer
Wayfarer
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:54 pm
Posts: 7
Harad is not overpowered... period. I dont think I need to add a big explanation, we have had pages of them already. If you can't beat Harad, make a better list or maybe you just are not as good as he is.

If a complete noob can take on a bunch of vets in a row, roll mediocre dice and win every game, then I will agree to them being overpowered. But that isn't the case. The haradrim can and will lose games, just like everyone else.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: