All times are UTC


It is currently Sun Sep 29, 2024 7:36 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 110 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: (deserves its own thread) I could be overreacting but...
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:50 am 
Loremaster
Loremaster
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:13 pm
Posts: 1465
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Images: 30
^Agree with your first two points RoG. On the third I see what you mean, but for me personally and I expect there are others like me, I've built my backlog on liquidation sales and on products that were going out of stock (only time I would pay full retail price besides the ones I really really want). Many here build their backlogs through second hand miniatures, e-bay and such. We also used to have discount independent online stores that made things more bearable to purchase, but GW has put a halt to that for international vending. And with todays prices now, I'd speculate that people's backlogs aren't increasing steadily as they once have unless they've found a good deal to avoid full retail prices.

Also what's funny about GW ditching the pricey metal for resin is that their new finecast models cost way more than ever before! And why so? I heard it's something about having to do with replacing metal molds and such and the cost of conversion, plus you get finer detail with finecast, YAY! This all justifies the price hikes. :roll:

_________________
My Lotr backlog: 305/952[][][][][][][][][][]32% completed
Painting Lineup: Mumakil x2, Rohan Heroes x8, Haradrim, SKoDA
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: (deserves its own thread) I could be overreacting but...
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:24 pm 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:42 pm
Posts: 3131
Location: In Angband, at Morgoth's feet.
I don't have a backlog (unless you count those 5 haradrim I don't need to paint) because I haven't been in the hobby that long. Tin and most every metal is skyrocketing in price due to scarcity caused by a lack of the metal itself or because China is buying it all up. Once they fix the (many) problems with FC, it'll be a product worth buying. I personally haven't had enough problems with it to not like the product, it's just too expensive to fit my budget right now.

_________________
:saruman "Leave Sauron to me."
If you're in the Raleigh, NC area, let me know.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: (deserves its own thread) I could be overreacting but...
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:26 pm 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:42 pm
Posts: 3131
Location: In Angband, at Morgoth's feet.
I suspect that FC prices are going to stay stable for quite awhile, whereas metal prices would probably surpass FC by alot in the next couple of years.

_________________
:saruman "Leave Sauron to me."
If you're in the Raleigh, NC area, let me know.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: (deserves its own thread) I could be overreacting but...
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:39 pm 
Kinsman
Kinsman
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 4:58 pm
Posts: 202
I was in a GW last Saturday for the 40K 25th birthday and of course they had that limited space marine model in finecast. Interestingly, the 10 or so copies I saw had no miscasts or air bubbles or anything at all. I've seen a couple of the limited finecast white dwarf models too and they seem pretty perfect.
Which means that they can produce top quality finecast if they want to- I'd guess it's something to do with numbers and it being easier to have consistant quality with a low run. The general lines we see in stores are being mass produced and that's what's probably causing the problems.
Not that it's an excuse or anything. GW should be building up stock of a particular finecast model for months in advance of release so they can ensure we get a good one straight away.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: (deserves its own thread) I could be overreacting but...
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:48 pm 
Loremaster
Loremaster
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:13 pm
Posts: 1465
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Images: 30
Well even if they fix their quality control problem, which would help, the pricing is too much. So I hope these miscasts complaints stop by time The Hobbit roles around, otherwise it will make it difficult for people to keep on ordering products through online stores. So it's good news Lorizael that you're seeing no flaws by now.

And another thing about backlog as Draugluin mentioned, it gets accumulated over time. I have 800 minis plus Warhammer because I've been collecting since 2004 about. It's amazing how much you can purchase when keeping a proper budget, and finding out deals and liquidation sales and local second hand sales, plus independent store discounts which unfortunately one of my indies is just closing down now, 30% off of GW products though. King's Champion here I come. Still sad though. This has nothing to do with being priced out by GW though. GW's present prices mean that I'll rarely buy new at full retail to add to my collection. Smaug might be the only one I'll buy full retail, but with a 550+ backlog I should really wait for a sale.
...Then again it's Smaug...

The thing about waiting for a sale is that you'll never know if it's going to happen in finding that particular model, but it is inevitable that retail prices will rise the longer you wait.

_________________
My Lotr backlog: 305/952[][][][][][][][][][]32% completed
Painting Lineup: Mumakil x2, Rohan Heroes x8, Haradrim, SKoDA
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: (deserves its own thread) I could be overreacting but...
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:21 pm 
Kinsman
Kinsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 122
Location: Harrogate, UK
Anecdotal evidence suggests that the initial Finecast releases had appalling quality control (every Great Beast deformed, over half of retail deliveries broken, etc.). This naturally did GW a great deal of harm in terms of trust and sales, but lately there have been very few complaints and quality is seen to match or exceed metals and plastic seemingly across the board.

It's no excuse but teething problems seem to have been the reason for the bad publicity of Finecast and GW are starting to lose their edge in terms of finest quality on the market. That said, their edge has been the backgrounds and intellectual property for some time now, rather than the miniatures or rules.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: (deserves its own thread) I could be overreacting but...
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 6:01 pm 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:33 pm
Posts: 3688
Location: Atlanta GA. U.S.A.
Images: 14
Quote:
but lately there have been very few complaints and quality is seen to match or exceed metals and plastic seemingly across the board.

I have not noticed that anyone has stopped complaining about fine cast.I think we are about to see a rash of customer service complaints as well.I still do not have my replacement beast. I have stopped buying from GW, so have many here. That may be the answer to why there are fewer complaints.
Quote:
match or exceed metals and plastic seemingly across the board

I have not seen any evidence of that.

I have vented enough. I think it is time to move on. I have formed an opinion. So have most of you. Let us try to go back to something constructive.
Use a dust mask and seal your miniatures carefully. :puppy:

_________________
"the same as a duck you must be made of wood"
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: (deserves its own thread) I could be overreacting but...
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:24 pm 
Kinsman
Kinsman
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:10 pm
Posts: 179
Ring_of_Gyges wrote:
...
2) Tin, the primary component of the "white metal" GW uses, has increased in price about 400% over the last ten years.* That's a lot, and that's going to scare the pants off anyone who's business is selling cunningly shaped lumps of tin. Resin has problems, but it is way more attractive to GW than skyrocketing tin prices. If customers reject finecast, GW will have to bite the bullet and return to metal with increases in price to match rising tin costs. Anyone remember New Coke? Companies can try a big initiative, see it flop, and go back to the old way. It costs a ton of money and is embarrassing as hell, but sometimes you have to do it. Personally, I won't buy finecast by mail. I want to see the packet and see the model before I pay for it because it's brittle and it has a high miscast rate. If GW can fix that, great. If they can't then they're going to have trouble convincing people to buy it if it is screwed up too often. As it is, I'm comfortable buying metal models and really leery about finecast. I've bought almost no finecast. If there are too many people like me, GW will have to face the music and switch back.


Very interesting adjusted long term tin chart, thanks. You started youre comparision (10 years) with an all time low, but i guess thats coincidence. However the chart relativizes youre statement. Further, and more important, someone has to calculate how much of the costs for a miniature is related to the tin materials used (of course this is weight related). My calculation says its really a low amount even with the high prices we see at the moment. So the price impact of rising tin prices is a joke compared to the price raises we seen with fincecast. Thus, your statement is much less convincing than it is on first sight. However feel free to present your calculation (my math sucks :) ).
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: (deserves its own thread) I could be overreacting but...
PostPosted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:52 am 
Kinsman
Kinsman
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:13 pm
Posts: 227
Location: Portland Oregon
If GW wants to make a new model (the Knight of the White Tower say), they need to pay someone to design the thing, someone to make a mold, someone to cast finished models from the mold, and someone to ship the bits all over the place. Who knows how much of their cost is in each step? Perhaps making the mold is the lion's share of the cost, maybe shipping is, I'd be very surprised if it was the sculptor.

I'll readily admit it's a guess that rising tin prices are a big deal for GW, I may be wrong. What else would motivate the change? The resin holds detail a little better, but it has all sorts of quality problems the metal models didn't. It seems an odd switch if tin isn't a significant cost that could be avoided.

One quibble I have about looking at the very high tin prices in the further past is that back in the day GW didn't use the same materials they use now. Minis from the bad old days were mostly lead because it was cheap, easy to work with, and hadn't be banned from consumer products yet. I couldn't say when GW abandoned lead, but my memory of growing up in the 80's is full of lead minis when the really high tin prices were going on.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: (deserves its own thread) I could be overreacting but...
PostPosted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:15 pm 
Kinsman
Kinsman
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:10 pm
Posts: 179
Ring_of_Gyges wrote:
If GW wants to make a new model (the Knight of the White Tower say), they need to pay someone to design the thing, someone to make a mold, someone to cast finished models from the mold, and someone to ship the bits all over the place. Who knows how much of their cost is in each step? Perhaps making the mold is the lion's share of the cost, maybe shipping is, I'd be very surprised if it was the sculptor.


Well, what I did was taking the current tin price for a ton of tin, the typical weight of a miniature, and then i calculated the tin price for one miniature (I know its not 100% tin, i just assumed this for the calculation). Compared to the current prices raises with finecast the tin price for a miniature seems really low. Of course I don't know the margin, the license costs and so on. But the impact of the tin price can only be relativly small.

Ring_of_Gyges wrote:
I'll readily admit it's a guess that rising tin prices are a big deal for GW, I may be wrong. What else would motivate the change? The resin holds detail a little better, but it has all sorts of quality problems the metal models didn't. It seems an odd switch if tin isn't a significant cost that could be avoided.


Of course I don't know. When youre doing business any cost factor you can avoid you should avoid, so I admit even a cost factor which is relativly small could motivate enough. However in this case they have underestimated the issues finecast causes, otherwise I cannot understand the decision at all.

Ring_of_Gyges wrote:
One quibble I have about looking at the very high tin prices in the further past is that back in the day GW didn't use the same materials they use now. ....


Yes I know. Lead is much much cheaper than tin.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 110 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: