Lorizael wrote:
I don't buy this whole 'change of direction' thing at all. I can't see any indication of a move towards collectors and away from gamers. Yes, this is a collecting hobby, it always has been. And the rules are there to sell models- but this has always been the case from the very start.
I find it odd that we have seen more rules releases; codexes, army books and expansions over the past 2 years than we had in the previous 10 years, and yet people think that GW are moving away from gaming!
True, there have been many new rule releases, but that doesn't mean their gamer friendly. We don't play other GW game systems ourselves, but I have heard a lot of people complain and even stop WFB and 40K because of the new rule systems and the rumors of the upcoming new edition.
All that gamers really want is a good solid rule system that is not always changing (and doesn't always need to be updated) and a comprehensive range of miniatures that are affordable and usable. GW is not providing this anymore.
This is especially obvious with the new Hobbit releases. Finecast basic troops are a gamer's nightmare, and The Battle of the Five Armies Supplement was released as a kind of after thought for those crazy people who still want to play games with their models.
We have to remember at the same time though that Priestley is working for Warlord, and is currently creating the new Beyond the Gates of Antares system. Though formerly a GW guy, it might be in his interest to bash GW to get more gamers for his own system...