J.R. wrote:
Alatar of Rhun wrote:
Aranarth wrote:
"If it has a shield, its just a standard sword. But if it has no shield, then it has an elven blade".
But under the new rules warriors are allowed to sling the shield across the backs
could you say where that is said in the rulebook ? Does it mean, elves can use their elven blade twohanded and still benefit from + 1D from the shield ? in that case those elven blade could be worth it.
I also wonder if glaives can be combined with shields, it seems it is..
Elves with two handed weapons 'could' sling a shield across their backs and get +1 defence, but they'd lose the ability to use their two handed special rule, so you wouldn't get +1 to wound.
It's been this way for a long time. As for the glaives for mirkwood elves, same principle would apply, after all they shield with those glaives as well as use them as elven blades/spears. Great piece of kit though.
I think people need to (who haven't already) just remember that the elven blade is there to give the elves killing power, but this is after you've began to thin their numbers or if you have an advantage in numbers in a singular fight, you might decide it's worth the -1 to roll.
In summary, yes you can give elven models with two handed weapons a shield (as long as it says so in their profile) however, you cannot benefit from the elven blade rule, it simply becomes a one-handed sword.