| The One Ring https://ww.one-ring.co.uk/ |
|
| Is this balanced fairly? https://ww.one-ring.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=27735 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | N00bie_Boy [ Sun Feb 02, 2014 4:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Is this balanced fairly? |
Campaign friends and I are doing. I am providing all models -_- so I had to set up the whole thing. Please review it, and give me criticism and suggestions as I am sure this is flawed. The good wish to hold Antioch- ruins of a once great city. The evil want to overrun it, and use it as a staging point for the fall of Middle Earth. Antioch is a strategic masterpiece; in position to strike out against Lothlorien and cross over the Misty Mountains; able to reach Rhovaion and Erebor, Isengard and Rohan, Gondor and to an extent, Mordor and the east and south, Dol Guldur and Mirkwood, and anything in between. If evil holds this, all of Middle Earth is jeopardized. If good holds it, evil can be thwarted from advancing. Terrain: Grassy-woodland with city ruins in middle. Walls outside Antioch can be scattered a bit, but not much. Points: 1700 Deployment: Good gets to send force into Antioch, and get 2 siege ladders to enter. However, all other good models must wait 3 turns before deploying, and even then must reach Antioch from in between 2 corners. Evil is same. Goals: Good wins if they survive 15 turns in control of Antioch. If they do, they can survive longer for bonus. Evil wins if they survive 15 turns in control of Antioch. If they do, the can survive longer for bonus. A tie is if neither side can control Antioch. Special Rules: Flag of Antioch In the middle of the ruined city, a flag of the now defunct kingdom still stands. If two models from the same side are within a 3" range of the flag, Antioch is theirs. If models from both sides are in range it is neutral, as if no one is in it. If it is neutral or evil, that turn doesn't count for good victory. If only one model from either side are left, Antioch can't be controlled and the game is a tie. Whatever side controls Antioch can move freely through either gate. If neutral, ladders must be used to enter. Siege of Antioch Ruined gates and walls can still be of use to the side that controls Antioch. The game is considered a siege. The Tides of Battle If either side is reduced to a quarter size, all models on that side must take courage tests. Prideful Warbands: Each side nominate a warband to extend to 18 troops. Also, special troops can take command of Warbands Forces: Good Battlecry Regiment Swords of Justice Boromir 12 Warriors of Minas Tirith Swords of Punishment Faramir Damrod 3 Osgiliath Vets 8 Guards of the Fountain Court Iron Company Skirmishers of Erebor Captain of Erebor 12 Warriors of Erebor Fist of Erebor (Prideful warband) Grim Hammer Captain 12 Grim Hammers 6 Khazad Guard King's Vanguard King's Champion 2 Heralds 4 Iron Guard 3 Vault Team Vault Team Delta Shieldbearer 3 Vault Team Gimli's Kin Gimli 12 Dwarf Rangers Prince's Outriders Prince's Guard Theodred 3 Royal Guard Alpha Division Mounted Banner Bearer 12 Warriors of Rohan Beta Division Banner Bearer 12 Warriors of Rohan Evil Saruman's Hammer Sappers of the White Hand Uruk Captain Uruk Siege Force 2 Berserkers Enforcers of the White Hand Mahur 6 Uruk Scouts Vanguard of the White Hand Ugluk 6 Uruk Scouts Wrath of the White Hand (Proud Warband) Uruk Shaman 6 Feral Uruk 6 Uruk Berserkers 2 Isengard Troll 3 Wildmen 1 Uruk Banner Bearer Battalion of Blood Lurtz 10 Uruk Warriors Battalion of Suffering Vrasku 8 Uruk Crossbow Goblin Raiding Party Marauders of the Misty Mountains Goblin Captain 9 Goblins Bringers of Chaos Goblin Captain 9 Goblins Harbingers of Torment Moria Goblin Captain 12 Moria Warriors The Dark Lord's Ravagers Narzug 12 Hunter Orcs Gundubad General 12 Orcs of Dol Guldor Mordor Orc Shaman 6 Mordor Orcs 2 Black Guard Shagrat 6 Mordor Orcs 2 Black Guard |
|
| Author: | SouthernDunedain [ Sun Feb 02, 2014 5:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is this balanced fairly? |
30 turns? That is quite long. Also both sides will need more siege equipment. Why do the good side have to wait 3 turns before deploying? |
|
| Author: | N00bie_Boy [ Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is this balanced fairly? |
SouthernDunedain wrote: 30 turns? That is quite long. Also both sides will need more siege equipment. Why do the good side have to wait 3 turns before deploying? Ok, I'll take more equipment, just don't want to go bankrupt on this battle. And evil has the same rules as good, so except one force must wait 3 turns as well. |
|
| Author: | Goldman25 [ Sun Feb 02, 2014 12:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is this balanced fairly? |
That depends. Are they likely to stumble across that most rare of artefacts, the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch? |
|
| Author: | N00bie_Boy [ Sun Feb 02, 2014 3:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is this balanced fairly? |
Goldman25 wrote: That depends. Are they likely to stumble across that most rare of artefacts, the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch? Lol, I'll just blow Isengard out of the sky! |
|
| Author: | N00bie_Boy [ Sun Feb 02, 2014 3:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is this balanced fairly? |
SouthernDunedain wrote: 30 turns? That is quite long. Also both sides will need more siege equipment. Why do the good side have to wait 3 turns before deploying? Also, what equipment do you recommend? |
|
| Author: | SouthernDunedain [ Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is this balanced fairly? |
Battering Rams, More Ladders, siege engines. |
|
| Author: | N00bie_Boy [ Sun Feb 02, 2014 10:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is this balanced fairly? |
SouthernDunedain wrote: Battering Rams, More Ladders, siege engines. Ok. Is the Mordor Siege Bow worth it at all? |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|