Lord Hurin wrote:
LordoftheBrownRing wrote:
Well three things....
1-Dont hate me! I love Uruks!
2-How many boring Gondor captains do we have? Madril? Cirion? Beregond? Damrod?
BOOOOOORRRRIIINNNNNNGGGGG
3-The Uruks were the main antagonist force for the whole second movie.
Well, to put it into perspective Gondor existed as one of (and a lot of that time THE single most) the most powerful realms in Middle-earth for some 3500 years. Isengard Uruks were around for a couple of years at best.
Having said that, I'd rather have book-based characters like Lugdush than GW invented junk like Vrasku.
I love Vrasku. A cool profile. And yes I understand Gondor was. Thats why I believe they have lame heros. Beregond....like really.....want a boring model with no cool rules. Almost every Hobbit model has a more interesting profile.
VandalCabbage wrote:
I'm not hating, merely expressing minor discontent with GW. Some factions barely have any named heroes (Khand doesn't have one, for example, since they are counted as part of the easterling list). I feel every faction should have at least one or two named captains, and five maximum. Not to mention Beregond and Damrod don't rank as captains as such, but that's nitpicking. If there was another Uruk captain, could he please please not be a scout. So many blooming scout captains...
As for Vrashku, not everything GW invents is junk. Look at Murin and Drar, for example. For me, Vrashku fits in better than Mauhur who is briefly mentioned in the books (though that's primarily due to that absurd topknot).
Yeah agreed about the gw made up stuff. And yeah man, as for the named heros, other armies definitely do need them. Im just adding to the topic not picking one or the other. It was never about that.