Sacrilege83 wrote:
Necromancer7 wrote:
They'll probably finish the first film with more of a climax. I imagine the first would cover most of The Hobbit, and conclude with the Battle of the Five Armies and the second would cover the assault on Dol Guldur and everything to do with the White Council.
I would be surprised if they did that. How much story is there to make the White Council a movie and why name it The Hobbit part 2? When the Eagles saved Thorin's company from certain death from the wargs and goblins that was climatic.
I remember when FotR came out people who didn't know Lotr at the time, including myself, found it abrupt how the film ended. There was a small battle, one member of the felllowship dies and the rest split up. Reallly that's the ending!? which was what most people were thinking. Because honestly I had friends expecting that the ring would be dropped into the volcano in the first freaking film, which wouldn't make sense because there's a part 2 & 3.
I think ultimately movie speculation rarely tends to result in an accurate version of what the screenwriters had in mind, but I was more going off what I'd read when it was originally announced.
It could work though, the second film could cover the whole story of the finding of the Ring, the search for Gollum, Saruman's fall to evil as well as his treachery within the White Council and the assault on Dol Guldur. It would then set things up nicely for The Lord of the Rings.
Don't know though, I'm sure when they finally come out we'll all be miles off and wonder why we hadn't come up with actual storyline
_________________
Feel free to check out my galleries and painting guides!
www.freewebs.com/necromancer7