General Elessar wrote:
Osbad wrote:
I can also see why GW would want to keep a lid on the news, and why others would want to leak it. I also think its pretty dim of them to let stocks run out like this and to make no definitive announcement. It means any announcement they make now will be unlikely to be believed by skeptics like me.
Why would they want to keep it secret? If they are ending production of metal models I would have thought that they would really publicise it in order to persuade customers to buy the models while they're still available.
Because they haven't completed the process yet and they don't want to face the chicken-licken response from gamers who dislike the swap? Because they are used to announcing stuff only once it is a done deal and this one has run into unforseen problems and isn't a done deal yet? Because they really don't know how to handle public relations and as has been demonstrated time after time, they are totally clueless in that department?
I never claimed their reasons were rational, just implied that they made sense to GW corporate management!
In the same way they didn't forwarn the public about the axing of the "bitz" service until the day it happened, and IMHO that was a much bigger deal. Just swapping the material and packaging arrangements for (say) 10% (?) of their product line pales in comparison to that move.
Of course it *could* be just that they're switching away from blister packaging to another format (one reason given by GW store staff for the stockouts) has coincided with casting problems (another reason given by GW store staff for the stockouts) and their existing preference for shifting slower selling metal models to "Direct Only".
Which is more likely in your view given GW's corporate track record of behaviour towards its long standing and "valued" customers?