halkias82 wrote:
Well, this thread took a curious turn.
Still on the issue of the goblins I will concede the point, as I might over the elves (those I want to see in play). But the characters are clearly on a different level than the previous characters. Seriously. Bolg kills... some important characters... and he has stats to challenge just about any hero in the game. Eomer, on the other hand, cuts through the entire host of Mordor, gets stranded in the middle and still continues killing, is covered in blood from head to toe in the end and all he gets is +1 st on the charge... Seriously? Same applies for Azog.
I can't put into words just how much I agree with this statement! The problem is this: for someone who hasn't read the books - which, sad to say, is the majority of players I know - all this doesn't matter at all... they look at Bolg's stats and are happy about it - he
is a huge Orc (that, hilariously IMO, doesn't get any screentime at all in Part I) after all. It's only when you take into account the context given by Tolkien in the books, that the painful discrepancy you stated becomes obvious: if Bolg gets the stats and special rules he gets, what will Beorn's stats be?
He utterly pwned Bolg, taking his head off with one swing! He'll have to be F8 S8 minimum to keep the two in proportion.
Sadly, the book-given balance has always been ignored at best, sometimes even reversed, by GW: Riders of Rohan, the best cavalry Middle-earth has ever seen, are lower F (unless upgraded via a character that fluff-wise should be the only Rohan character to focus his benefits on
infantry) than Harad Serpent Riders - who in the book get absolutely slaughtered by the vastly outnumbered Rohirrim. Weirdly enough, their tactical MO is reversed as well - Book: Rohirrim have long spears (=lances), Haradrim don't (Scimitars only); Game: Haradrim have war spears (=lances), Rohirrim don't. Seriously, WHY?
Théoden in the book gets compared with the God of War himself, outrides the rest of his army, easily kills the Haradrim Chieftain (cf. Suladan) and then some - yet his game profile is mediocre at best and does he get any cool Bolg-like special rules? Nope. Sure, he dies in the only real battle he fought (though he did some butchering at Helm's Deep, too). But. So. Does. Bolg.
Quote:
LotR might not be WHFB or 40K, but GW is still GW. They will use all of the same tricks to sell the new army.
Indeed. It really began with the release last January (?). They released unfluffy, but powerful (and overpriced) stuff nobody had asked for: GBoG (ok, this one is semi-fluffy), out-of-scenario Watcher-Crab, mini-Balrogs, three Goblins riding a warg, etc. rather than stuff people had been begging for for
years but which wouldn't have fit their draw-new-(kid)-players-by-releasing-"awesome new"-monsters-MO that can be seen in WHFB and 40k as well. Plastic Rohan Royal Guard, new options for High Elves, and all the other stuff that would have made existing players happy just wouldn't have served as well as a gateway drug. You can't blame GW for that, but you sure can despise them for it on a Tolkien-level. ^^