Sticky Fingersss wrote:
Quote:
I didn't say one was influenced by the other. I said it was exactly like WHF. WHF has Elves on stags. The Hobbit has Elves on stags.
Then if they are not influenced by the other, how is the fact that the Hobbit has elves on stags a negative thing?
I didn't say that either. You've completely missed my point yet again. I said nothing influence one way or the other (it goes without saying, GW takes its cue from PJ/Tolkien).
I don't much like Warhammer Fantasy's particular brand of cartoonish, over the top fantasy with monsters a dime a dozen, and any creature you can imagine being used as mounts by some other (humanoid) creature (dragons, undead dragons, Cold One dino lizards, pterodactyl like flying dinosaurs, triceratops like dinosaurs, mammoths, rhino like creatures, eagles, half-lion-half-eagle griffons, pregasus winged horses, undead scorpions/horses/horse drawn chariots,
Stags, Orc Squigs, Slaanesh serpent creatures, Nurgle snails, giant spiders, giant spiders the size of a house). You name it, if it has a back something else probably rides it.
I much prefer the more nuanced, subtle and ultimately believable world presented by Tolkien. Things like stags being ridden as mounts as though they were horses bred and trained to be ridden blur the differences between Tolkien's version of fantasy and GW's version and that is something that I am uncomfortable with. Things like these stag mounts and Radagasts Rabbit drawn sled (even if they were Rhosgobel rabbits) will strech my dispension of disbelief to breaking point.