Thanks for posting photos! All in all not a bad release, from my perspective.
The Erebor captain looks nice - nothing special to me but he fits his troops and is still suitably heroic-looking, based on both his pose and his weaponry.
I'm personally a fan of the Dale captain, but I do see how his face might look a tad silly. If I had any intentions of collecting Dale, I might get him though.
I like Thrain better than Thror, although for me that's down to WETA's decisions more than GW's. Both models are well-execcuted, but I really like the look of this one. Maybe the first
Hobbit model that I buy...
Honestly, I think Gollum looks awful. The pose would be fine as more of a collector's model (and lord knows GW have done plenty of those, so I'm not complaining about that), and the paint job is cool given the context of the miniature (underground lake), but the sculpting looks very blocky, crude, and amatuerish to me. I'm just not that impressed.
I quite like both the Gandalf and the Bilbo, but that's because I'm a sucker for hobbits and always looking to get more, and the Gandalf is in an interesting new pose, despite the fact that there are already plenty of Gandal poses out there. Might be the second
Hobbit set I buy...
The real shame here was already mentioned by The Arkenstone, though:
Quote:
The captains can easily be converted out of the existing plastic ranges so these single Finecast models for $15-$20 each are not a good value IMO
Even if the models look nice, I just don't think they're characters that can reasonably command that kind of price. A more powerful, unique named hero to lead an army? I can see them being a bit more expensive, but a generic captain who doesn't stand out
that much from the troops, no matter how nice the model is, shouldn't be priced comparably to epic named heroes for practical reasons, and are more easily replaced by conversions from the troop boxes.