Paradigm wrote:
Funny you should say that about Faramir, he's the same for me. So many times I have given him a chance to show his quality, which are usually followed by 1s/2s To Hit, rolling 1 less than required to Wound, or otherwise being outshone by the (ever-reliable) Rangers around him. And Boromir, on the other hand, has never let me down. Minature Wargaming imitating life imitating art, perhaps?
No kidding...its extremely true.
Im not a fan of Gondor in general, so I already have an issue there. Then when I put Faramir in the list, my motivation is just demolished.
His profile is an issue I think.
For his initial point cost, hes not bad. But then I think thats where you have to leave him.
Because people think, ah, I wanna max him out....so lets say you give him heavy armor, a shield, an armored horse, and a lance. Make him a total bamf.
He then with various upgrades is 100 points.
So youre paying that for a 2 wound, fight 5 profile.....
If you leave him as is, and take him with Osgiliath vets, I think he can be more worth it being a low cost with 3 might. Maybe even just a regular horse too.... but that starts the slippery slope of paying too much.
My heroes for Gondor at 750 points will always go in this order:
Boromir, badass.
Damrod/Beregond
Cirion/Denethor
Then Faramir maybe. If points are 1000 Id rather pay a lot more and take Aragorn......
Idk. I hate a lack of trust in him, and his profile. I think the King of men is even better. You lose 1 might and fate yes, but you save ten points, and its the same profile. I think Faramir is just in that bad range of points I dislike. I like heroes that are like 65 or less, and then 95 or more generally.....not that those are set #s but I just happen to see that in myself.
Its weird. In Gondor, Knight of the Tower, Faramir, and Kings are the only heroes with fight 5, and I think I would never take any of them.
Id go for the fight 6 guys who will dominate combats, or the fight 4 who will lend to more troops and still all are either EXTREMELY low in points, or have 3 might like Cirion, and Madril. Eh. Thats my take on it. Hes the middle child of Gondor. I agree that he shouldnt have fight 6 though, or 4 only.
Silver_legion wrote:
Hmm my number one problem model that gives me jip every time I go against them... Dwarf archers, seriously my friends archers are better than his heroes. I'm not afraid of his Gimli or his kings, its his archers.
One round of shooting from 5 of the the little blighters took isulder down to one wound and forces him to use all his fate...
They also are beasts in combat never doing much killing but they hold me up long enough to stop me from taking a flank when I need it. Seriously major thorn in my side from turn 1 !
Lol if you think thats tough wait till you see hobbit archers. I took down a decent amount of Knights of Dol Amroth and a ton of hunter orcs before.
At less points that a goblin with shield, they have a 3+ to shoot!
One of the most under emphasized armies in the game. I believe at any pooints value thats like 750 or less, I could dominate a tournament.
I went to a small I think 125pt test day with them, and went 4-0 with only our own GloryforGondor breaking me that day, or coming close.
I massacred Isengard, and Dwarves. Another guy brough wood elves and the game was long and boring but I shot him to death with so few troops.
I forgot who I played the final battle, but it didnt make me fearful of losing either.